A threat assessment names the actors around your site, your people or your event, and answers two questions about each: do they intend to, and are they able to. GeoBit builds it from the record: what each actor has done, where, how they organize, what they have said, and what has changed. Sourced, confidence-tagged, delivered on a date.
"Elevated threat environment" is not an assessment. A threat assessment names who, says what they want and what they can do, shows the evidence, and tells you what would change the picture.
Identify. The criminal groups, activist networks, insurgents, insiders, hostile competitors or individuals whose interests touch your site, your people or your event. From the record, not from a template.
Intent. What each actor has said and done about targets like yours. Statements, past actions, campaigns, the meetings and channels where action is planned.
Capability. What they have actually done and could do: reach, numbers, weapons, money, access, and the tactics they have used before.
History and trend. Incidents attributed to each actor, mapped and dated, and whether the tempo is rising or falling.
Indicators. The specific things that would move an actor's rating: a new statement, a change in tactics, a date on the calendar. So the assessment can be watched, not just filed.
The target: a site, a person, an event, an organization. What you already know. One working day to a scope, a date and a quote.
one working dayEvery actor in the record whose interests touch the target, in every language, from months of incidents, statements and channels.
the floorEach actor placed on intent and capability by a named analyst, with the evidence for each placement attached.
two axesA second analyst argues the other side. Two sources before a claim. Rumor stays rumor. Precision stated on every location.
red teamThe report, the actor map, the indicators, walked through with you. Optional: the indicators go onto the watch.
on the dateCrime groups, activists organizing against the plant, insurgents in the district, the insider risk the record shows. Pairs with a security assessment of the same site.
The actors with a reason to reach an executive or a delegation, where they have acted before, and the pattern of a trip against that picture. Feeds the journey plan.
A message, a post, a tip. Who is behind it as far as the open record shows, whether they have acted before, and whether the tempo is escalating. Written so counsel and police can use it.
Who matters most, why, and what has changed since the last look. Written for the person who has to decide.
Every actor placed on intent and capability. The top-right corner is the list you act on.
Who they are, what they have done, where, how they organize and communicate, and the evidence for each placement.
Incidents attributed to each actor, mapped and dated, with the trend: rising, stable or falling tempo.
The specific things that would move each actor's rating, so the assessment can go onto the watch instead of into a drawer.
Every source, statement and incident the assessment rests on, linked, dated and confidence-tagged.
Before a plant opens, after a protest, when a group names you. Pairs with the security assessment.
The actors around a principal or a delegation, and the pattern of a trip against that picture.
Who would target the event, what they have done at similar events, and the indicators to watch in the weeks before.
A specific threat assessed and written so it can be acted on, shared with police, or relied on later.
The threat picture around an asset, on one scale across a portfolio.
Who controls the ground, who has targeted aid workers, and what has changed since the last mission.
A threat assessment you cannot act on is a weather report. Ours names the actors, places each one by intent and capability with the evidence attached, and tells you what would change the picture. Then the indicators can go onto the watch.
A site, a person, an event or the organization. What prompted the question and what you already know.
What the assessment will cover, when it lands, and the quote. Say yes and identification starts the same day.
Walked through with you and whoever has to act on it. The indicators can go onto the watch the same week.
| The job | The usual brief | GeoBit threat assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Actors | "Various groups active in the area" | Named, with what each has done and where |
| Intent and capability | Blended into one adjective | Two axes, each with evidence |
| Sources | Summarized | Linked, dated, confidence-tagged; rumor labelled rumor |
| Specific threats | Forwarded to police | Credibility and escalation assessed from the record, written for counsel |
| What would change it | Not stated | Indicators named per actor |
| Afterwards | Filed | Indicators onto the watch, if you want them |
You do not have to hire a desk to start. Pick one fixed first thing, or describe something else entirely, tell us where and when, and a person comes back within one working day with a scope, the date it lands, and the quote. Say yes and the work starts the next business day.
We build your maps for you — daily or weekly — and deliver them.
Draw your areas; our AI watches them 24/7 and alerts you.
An AI-driven Global Security Operations Center for your org.
An engineer embedded with your team, deployed anywhere.
A named analyst on your channels, with the whole system behind them.
Hire the team and get the output: one to ten operators, every offering included.
A piece of intelligence work, done for you and delivered on a date.
How exposed a site is, from the fence line outward, with ranked fixes.
What could go wrong, how likely, how bad, and what moves the score.
Tell us the target and what prompted the question. We come back within one working day with a scope, a date and a quote.