Infrastructure operators face two attack surfaces that rarely share a screen: the physical world around the asset and the control systems inside it. We assess both, map what depends on what, model what fails when something breaks, and put the plant's alarms on the same watch floor as the protest at the gate. One report, one set of priorities, one screen.
We bring an engineer who has built control-room software and an analyst who watches the world around the plant. The assessment covers both, in one report, with one set of priorities.
Control-system assessment. Asset and protocol inventory across the industrial protocols in use, alarm hygiene, network exposure checks against public scanners, and controls mapped to the IEC 62443 standard.
Cyber-physical posture. Where a control-system compromise becomes a physical event, and where a physical breach becomes a control-system one.
Dependency and cascade mapping. A governed asset registry with a dependency graph, so you can answer what goes dark when this feeder trips or this fibre is cut.
Hazard and resilience modelling. Physics-based flood and earthquake simulation, damage estimates, cascading-failure and recovery modelling for portfolios and jurisdictions.
Standards and regulatory. NERC CIP-014, CFATS, ISPS, IEC 62443 and ISO 22301 alignment, with the evidence pack to show it.
Assets, protocols, links and criticality into a governed registry. What you have, where it is, what talks to what.
registryNetwork exposure against public scanners, alarm hygiene, control gaps; and the physical picture around every asset at three scales.
both surfacesThe graph: feeders, fibres, pumps, substations, sites and the people who depend on them.
graphHazard scenarios run through the graph: what goes dark, for how long, and what it costs. Recovery curves and investment cases.
modelledOne roadmap for both surfaces, ranked by exposure reduced per dollar, with the regulatory evidence pack and the playbooks for incidents that cross the boundary.
one roadmapSomeone who has built control-room software: inventory, protocols, alarm management, exposure, and the controls that map to the standard.
Someone who watches the world around the plant: the physical threat picture, the approaches, the actors, the protest forecast.
Plant alarms pushed to the floor beside the physical picture around the site, ranked together, with a human deciding what happens next.
Inventory, exposure, control gaps and a prioritised roadmap, with the physical posture around the asset in the same report.
Assets, links and criticality, queryable and mapped. Answer "what goes dark" in a sentence.
Hazard scenarios, expected damage, recovery curves and the investment cases they justify.
For the incidents that cross from the control room to the fence line and back.
Controls mapped to the regime you answer to, with the evidence behind each one.
Every asset watched around the clock on the managed GSOC, with plant alarms on the same screen.
Substations, feeders, terminals and corridors; NERC CIP-014 alignment with the evidence.
Pumps, plants, reservoirs and the control systems that run them, overlaid with incident reporting.
Dependency mapping for the fibre that everything else assumes will stay up.
Community opposition, planned protests and grid dependency feeding a live rank across the estate.
Chokepoint infrastructure, ISPS alignment, and the picture around the terminal.
Resilience modelling across portfolios and jurisdictions: what fails first, what to fix first.
Our own control-system and resilience platforms can be deployed for operators who want them: multi-protocol ingestion, alarm management, a historian, an assistant that proposes but never executes control actions, and simulation that runs air-gapped where it must. Everything integrates with the managed GSOC.
The site or portfolio, the control systems in play, the regime you answer to, and what prompted the question.
What the assessment covers, remote or on site, when the report lands, and the quote. The engineer and the analyst are named.
Walked through with your operations and security leads. The assets can go onto the watch the same week.
| The job | Two vendors | GeoBit critical infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| Physical and control-system posture | Two reports that never meet | One report, one set of priorities |
| What fails when this fails | Tribal knowledge | A governed dependency graph you can query |
| Hazards | A paragraph | Physics-based scenarios with damage, recovery curves and investment cases |
| Regulatory evidence | Assembled before the audit | Controls mapped to the regime, with evidence, as part of the work |
| After the report | Next year's report | Assets on the watch; plant alarms beside the physical picture |
| Deployment | Cloud only | Our cloud, yours, on site, or air-gapped |
You do not have to hire a desk to start. Pick one fixed first thing, or describe something else entirely, tell us where and when, and a person comes back within one working day with a scope, the date it lands, and the quote. Say yes and the work starts the next business day.
We build your maps for you — daily or weekly — and deliver them.
Draw your areas; our AI watches them 24/7 and alerts you.
An AI-driven Global Security Operations Center for your org.
An engineer embedded with your team, deployed anywhere.
A named analyst on your channels, with the whole system behind them.
Hire the team and get the output: one to ten operators, every offering included.
A piece of intelligence work, done for you and delivered on a date.
How exposed a site is, from the fence line outward, with ranked fixes.
Who would do it and could they: actors placed by intent and capability.
What could go wrong, how likely, how bad, and what moves the score.
Find the pathway before the act: subjects assessed, places watched, cases filed.
Plans and drills before, a response desk in minutes during, after-action after.
Tell us the asset, the control systems in play and the regime you answer to. We come back within one working day with a scope, a date and a quote.